In re the Arbitration between Goldmar Hotel Corp. & Morningside Studios, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The lease obligations on appellant’s part to keep the demised premises in good repair and to comply with all governmental laws and requirements were absolute and unconditional. The only provision in the lease for arbitration was in event of disputes as to whether repairs or replacements were necessary. There could not be any question as to the necessity of removing violations of the Multiple Dwelling Law and naturally there was no provision in the lease for arbitration as to violations. While a failure to repair might also be a violation, to that extent there would be no arbitrable question.
We…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Harris v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Sabates v. International Med. Centers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Weiner v. WeinerNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Mendelsohn v. A & D Catering Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1983
- In re MeiselsNew York Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.