Legal Opinion
Mendelsohn v. A & D Catering Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 24, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Vincent Pizzuto, J.
Motions numbered 28, 87, 108 and 109 of the March 18, 1983 calendar are consolidated for the purposes of this decision. In brief these motions seek the following types of relief:(1) motion number 28 is brought by petitioners, Jacob Mendelsohn and Mordchai Z. Greenfield, pursuant to CPLR 7503 (subd [b]) seeking to permanently stay the arbitration demanded by respondent;(2) motion number 87 is brought by the respondent, A & D Catering Corporation, for an order staying the petitioners from proceeding with a landlord and tenant action in the Civil Court,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & NombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Nationwide General Insurance v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- De Sapio v. KohlmeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- In re the Arbitration between Aimcee Wholesale Corp. & Tomar Products, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Associated Teachers of Huntington, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sabates v. International Med. Centers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Mendelsohn v. A & D Catering Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Great Northern Associates, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993