Legal Opinion
Weiner v. Weiner
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 1, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdward J. Greenfield, J.
Motions bearing calendar numbers 19 and 126 of September 27, 1976 are consolidated for the purpose of disposition.
Can there be an Ernest M. Weiner, D.P.M., P.C., without Ernest M. Weiner? That question is presented by plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction restraining the defendants from utilizing the name Ernest M. Weiner, D.P.M., P.C.* Defendants oppose that application and move for an order staying this proceeding upon the grounds that the parties are obligated to arbitrate their disputes.
Ernest M. Weiner is a podiatrist admitted to practice in several States, including New…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- In re the Arbitration between Aimcee Wholesale Corp. & Tomar Products, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Bailly v. BettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Austrian, Lance & Stewart, P. C. v. Hastings Properties, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1976
- Morgan v. . SchuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Spaulding v. BenenatiNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Infosearch, Inc. v. HorowitzCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
- Allstate Insurance v. HorowitzCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
- DDS Partners, LLC v. CelenzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005