Noble v. United States Postal Service
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
Upon consideration of the briefs filed by the parties and the district court record, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed September 13, 2002, dismissing the complaint for want of prosecution be vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings. Fed. R. Civ. P 41(b) provides that a court may dismiss an action for failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with the Rules of Civil Procedure or any order of the court. Such dismissals are reviewed for abuse of discretion. See Bristol Petroleum Corp. v. Harris, 901 F.2d 165, 167 (D.C.Cir.1990). Because…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Bristol Petroleum Corporation v. Larry D. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Luis Felipe Velazquez-Rivera v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Stephanie Trakas v. Quality Brands, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
4Cited by17 opinions
- Peterson v. Archstone Communities LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Paul Morrissey v. Alejandro MayorkasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- ['Cartagena v. Centerpoint Nine, Inc.']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Ofisi v. BNP Paribas, S.A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Vivaldi Servicios de Seguridad, Inc. v. Maiso Group, Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.