State v. Bowman
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
The state appeals an order of the trial court, which suppressed the testimony of a psychologist in this case, charging defendant with criminal sexual penetration of his daughter. We affirm.
The order of suppression was entered following a hearing at which the testimony of the psychologist was tendered in its entirety. The alleged criminal sexual penetration occurred in November 1982. Charges were filed in February 1985 and the psychologist evaluated the child in June 1985. In preparation for trial, the state arranged for the child to be examined to determine whether or…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- State v. MarksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MilbradtOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.