Legal Opinion
James Stewart Walker v. James Bailey
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 17, 1957No. Patent Appeal 6288PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal by James Stewart Walker from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences of the United States Patent Office, awarding priority of invention of the subject matter of Interference No. 86,646 to the senior party James Bailey.
The invention in issue is a process of producing hollow articles of thermoplastic resin material. In carrying out the process each of the parties employs a vertically extending mandrel provided with an axial air passage and having an external shape corresponding to the desired interior shape of the mouth of the hollow article to be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. BartonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Hull v. DavenportCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- Martus v. HeiseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Farmer v. SchweyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- Russell v. SissonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cottonwood Estates, Inc. v. Paradise Builders, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Day v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
- Haskell v. ColebourneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Anthony F. D'Amico v. Fuji KoikeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- John O. Paivinen v. Eugene A. SandsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968