Legal Opinion

Martus v. Heise

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 14, 1930No. 2275PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the decision of the examiner of interferences awarding priority of invention to appellee, George W. Heise.

The invention in issue relates to the addition of zeolitic agents— one of which is “ permutit ” — to the electrolyte in a caustic alkali electric cell for the purpose of increasing electrolyte efficiency.

The counts in issue read as follows:

1. An electric cell, of the copper oxid type having positive electrode and negative electrodes and a liquid caustic alkali electrolyte, said cell also…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olson v. PospeshilCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Scott T. JolleyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Brown v. BartonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  3. James Stewart Walker v. James BaileyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  4. Meyer Sletzinger v. Frank H. Lincoln, William P. Schneider and George B. SperoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API