Legal Opinion
Gustavo Urbina v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 17, 2014No. 13-1084, 13-1465PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Petition for review denied in part and dismissed in part by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge AGEE joined.
DIAZ, Circuit Judge:
The Immigration and Nationality Act permits the Attorney General to cancel removal of certain aliens. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). Although the Attorney General has discretion in such matters, the statute requires the alien to have “been physically present in the United States for a continuous period of not less than 10 years immediately preceding the date of such application.” Id. § 1229b(b)(l)(A). In this case, Gustavo Urbina,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Okechukwu Uzo Onyeme v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Massis v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Narine v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ and CAPULA-CORTESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
- Yi Wang v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Milton Orozco-Velasquez v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Pablo Mejia-Castanon v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.