Legal Opinion

Owin v. Liquid Carbonic Corporation

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided December 19, 1941No. Civil Action 463PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNERLY, District Judge.

This is a suit by Plaintiff against Defendant under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, Sections 201 to 219, Title 29 U.S.C.A. Plaintiff alleges that he was an employee of Defendant from the effective date of the Act (October 24, 1938) to January 13, 1940, that during such time, the business of Defendant and the character of service .performed by Plaintiff came within the scope of the Act, and that he worked more hours per week than permitted by such Act. He sues for pay for 1789 hours overtime, penalty, and attorney’s fees.

Defendant denies and combats Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Super-Cold Southwest Co. v. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  3. Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  4. Klotz v. IppolitoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1941
  5. White Motor Co. v. LittletonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
  2. Loggins v. Steel Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  3. Joseph v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  4. Hollingsworth v. Cities Service Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Brittan v. Hudson & Manhattan R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API