Legal Opinion

State v. Gilliland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 1988No. 10-86-02061; CA A41436PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for being an exconvict in possession of a firearm. ORS 166.270. The sole contention is that the court erred in denying his motion to dismiss for lack of speedy trial under ORS 135.760. 1 We reverse.

An information of felony was filed in district court on January 20,1986, charging defendant with being an exconvict in possession of a firearm. At that time he was incarcerated in the Oregon Correctional Institution. On February 19, pursuant to ORS 135.760, he mailed a request for trial, which the district attorney’s office received on February 21. No proceedings…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. KentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. GuestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. BennerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. NealCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API