Legal Opinion

Field v. Field

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 27, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainant's bill is filed under section 26 of our Divorce act (2 Comp. Stat. p. 2038) against defendant, as her husband, to procure an order for support and maintenance. By petition filed in the cause complainant now seeks an order for support pending final hearing.

The amended bill and petition disclose that defendant has procured in the State of Nevada a decree of divorce against her. That divorce she attacks as void in this state, alleging, among other things, fraud in its procurement. These averments of the bill and petition attacking the validity of the Nevada divorce decree are denied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schneider v. SchneiderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  2. Robinson v. RobinsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
  3. Profenius v. ProfeniusNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Renner v. RennerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  2. Todd v. Policemen's, Etc., Fund of City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API