Legal Opinion
Schneider v. Schneider
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided June 19, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Petitioner seeks a decree of divorce from defendant notwithstanding the circumstance that defendant has procured in the State of Nevada a decree of divorce against her.
The evidence may be said to establish that petitioner is entitled to the relief sought by her unless the decree of the Nevada court shall be deemed operative as a bar. This necessitates a determination of the force to be given in this state to the Nevada decree.
At the time of the Nevada decree (August 10th, 1925) defendant herein had resided in that state for the period required by the law of that state to confer jurisdiction…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Gildersleeve v. GildersleeveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Felt v. FeltSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Polyckronos v. PolyckronosNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
- Kraskin v. KraskinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Miele v. MieleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Field v. FieldNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928