Legal Opinion

Todd v. Policemen's, Etc., Fund of City of Newark

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 23, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

14 N.J. Super. 508 (1951)

82 A.2d 233

MARY L. TODD, PLAINTIFF,

v.

THE POLICEMEN'S AND FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided June 23, 1951.

Messrs. Kalisch & Kalisch (Mr. Samuel Kalisch, Jr., appearing), attorneys for plaintiff.

Mr. Charles Handler (Mr. Thomas M. Kane, appearing), attorney for defendant.

DANIEL J. BRENNAN, J.S.C.

This is a proceeding in lieu of prerogative writ.

The facts are stipulated between counsel representing the parties. Succinctly it appears that the plaintiff, claiming to be the widow of one John…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Atherton v. AthertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Staedler v. StaedlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  3. Peff v. PeffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  4. Munday v. VailSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1871
  5. Felt v. FeltSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Loeb v. LoebSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955
  2. Reeves v. Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Reeves v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Reed v. ReedMontana Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Reed v. ReedMontana Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API