Legal Opinion

Mooney v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided September 7, 2007No. A-9304PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Frank W. Mooney seeks post-conviction relief from his conviction and sentence for first-degree sexual assault. In this appeal, Mooney asserts that he is entitled to relief on two bases.

First, Mooney contends that he rejected a favorable plea agreement because his attorney mistakenly (and incompetently) told him that he would be treated as a second felony offender for presumptive sentencing purposes, and that he therefore faced a presumptive term of 15 years' imprisonment if he went to trial and was convicted. After Mooney rejected the proposed plea bargain, he was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Salinas v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Covey v. Covey's Little America, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Stormont v. Astoria Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Simmons v. McDanielNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Mooney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Forrest J. Ahvakana v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2020
  2. State v. StrahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Terry Anthony Clayton v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023
  4. Brian F. Hall v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025
  5. Gregory Marino v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API