Mooney v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Frank W. Mooney seeks post-conviction relief from his conviction and sentence for first-degree sexual assault. In this appeal, Mooney asserts that he is entitled to relief on two bases.
First, Mooney contends that he rejected a favorable plea agreement because his attorney mistakenly (and incompetently) told him that he would be treated as a second felony offender for presumptive sentencing purposes, and that he therefore faced a presumptive term of 15 years' imprisonment if he went to trial and was convicted. After Mooney rejected the proposed plea bargain, he was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Salinas v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Covey v. Covey's Little America, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Stormont v. Astoria Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Simmons v. McDanielNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Mooney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Forrest J. Ahvakana v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2020
- State v. StrahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Terry Anthony Clayton v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023
- Brian F. Hall v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025
- Gregory Marino v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025