State v. Strahl
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Defendant was convicted of first degree murder and grand theft. He moved for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence: the State’s key witness was twice convicted of perjury in an unrelated criminal case. Finding that the newly discovered evidence was material and probably would produce an acquittal on the first degree murder charge, the circuit court granted a new trial. On appeal, the State argues that the new evidence, being merely impeaching, was insufficient to support the grant of a new trial. We find no abuse of discretion because the newly discovered…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Wallach, Rusty Kent London, Eugene Robert Wallach, A/K/A "E. Robert (Bob) Wallach," and Wayne Franklyn ChinnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Daniel P. Taglia and Robert J. McDonnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Darren J. Custis, United States of America v. Darren J. CustisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. OtobhialeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Cook v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2013