Legal Opinion

Connell v. Berland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 30, 1928PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

The action is for damages for personal injuries caused by the defendant’s automobile. The jury were justified in finding from the evidence that the defendant was negligent in that he parked his automobile in a congested locality where concededly he knew that children were constantly playing in the street, leaving the car, which was equipped with a self-starter, with the doors unlocked and with the ignition key in the switch. The car was left in that condition for more than half an hour. It was started by a boy, who thereafter jumped from it. The car then ran wild, ran over the curb and struck…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maloney v. . KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Gumbrell v. BreweryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. Kaplan v. Shults Bread Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ross v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. Collentine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Mayer v. Temple Properties Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Parnell v. Holland Furnace Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  5. Garis v. EberlingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API