Legal Opinion
State v. McClure
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 13, 1980No. 4576PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Summary reversal was proposed. The State has responded by a timely memorandum in opposition, contending that reversal is improper. They have attached the affidavit of the assistant district attorney involved in the case and a partial transcript.
The trial court received a communication from the jury. After consultation with the attorneys involved, the court responded by a written note submitted to the jury through the bailiff. There is no complaint on appeal that the court’s response was incorrect, either factually or as a matter of law. Compare State v. Stephens, 93 N.M.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pedro Rodriquez Bustamante v. Frank A. Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- State v. MaesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. OronaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. StephensNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Pedro Rodriquez Bustamante v. Harold J. Cardwell (Frank A. Eyman), Warden, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hovey v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. PriceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. TaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. PereaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. ZinnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.