Legal Opinion
Pedro Rodriquez Bustamante v. Harold J. Cardwell (Frank A. Eyman), Warden, Arizona State Prison
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 13, 1974No. 73-1823PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Pedro Rodriquez Bustamante appeals from an order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He challenges the district court ruling that, although his absence from the courtroom at the time a tape recording of instructions was replayed to the jury constituted error, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm.
Bustamante’s conviction for first-degree murder was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Arizona in 1968. State v. Bustamante, 103 Ariz. 551, 447 P.2d 243 (1968). Subsequently, he filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court in Arizona,…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Pedro Rodriquez Bustamante v. Frank A. Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Ramon Figueroa-PazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Leroy Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Outlaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- United States v. Guillermo ArriagadaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by30 opinions
- Charles William Proffitt v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Offender RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- People v. HoveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Donald Alan Miller v. A.A. Stagner and R.L. Pulley, Leroy Freeman v. A.A. Stagner and R.L. PulleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Floyd Julius Patrin, Sr., United States of America v. Barbara PatrinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- James Edward Hegler v. Robert G. Borg, Warden Dan LungrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.