State v. Taylor
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
„ OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
This court granted defendant’s application for an interlocutory appeal raising two issues:
1. Was defendant denied his constitutional right to be confronted with the witnesses against him when he was excluded from a competency hearing conducted by a magistrate during preliminary examination, and when his counsel was restricted to submitting written questions; and
2. Was the hearsay statement of the incompetent witness, here a three-year-old, offered through the parents admissible, and if so, did this nevertheless deny defendant his constitutional right of confrontation?
Def…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CoffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. D.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- John Doe, Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Camino Real Mobile Home Park Partnership v. WolfeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.