Legal Opinion

Moore v. Chilson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1924No. Civil No. 2149PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLyman, J.

— This action is by Chilsons to foreclose a chattel mortgage given by Barber to secure the purchase price of cattle with range and equipment. Judgment was for the plaintiff. The appellants, trustee in bankruptcy of Barber, a voluntary bankrupt, and receiver of the Bank of Phoenix, both represent unsecured creditors of Barber, and contest the mortgage, because not filed for record in the county of Barber’s residence before their debts were contracted. The trial court found as a fact that the mortgage had been in due time filed for record in Gila county, where the property was located. This…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Karst v. . GaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Grace v. Wade & MainsTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  4. Stephens v. . PerrineNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Ruggles v. CannedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Madrigal v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. H. W. Glessner, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Marvin K. Dunagan, Bankrupt v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. Smith v. MangelsArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Spanish Language Television of Arizona, Inc. v. AltschulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. Barber v. Reina Nash Motor CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API