Legal Opinion

United States v. Arnold

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 28, 1913No. 1027PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 28370 (T. D. 32488),

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The importers, although represented by counsel upon the docket of the court, have not submitted a brief or made any oral argument before us in this case, having stipulated on their part to submit the case upon the decision of the Board of General Appraisers.

It appears from the record that certain merchandise was entered by the importers at New York, December 8, 1910. It was found by the appraiser to consist of leather cases fitted with manicure sets and returned for duty as fitted leather cases at 50 per cent ad valorem under the last clause of paragraph 452 of the tariff act of August 5,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Krusi v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SheldonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Doap Leun Hong Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API