Legal Opinion
James River Equipment Co. v. Beadle County Equipment, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 22, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
[¶ 1.] James River Equipment Co. (James River), formerly known as Brandt Equipment Co., purchased an implement dealership from Beadle County Equipment, Inc. (Seller). Used equipment constituted a significant part of the transaction. After the purchase, James River discovered that the hours of usage for five combines that were part of the used equipment inventory were not as indicated by Seller. James River sued for breach of contract and breach of express warranty. A court trial was held. The trial court found no actionable warranty existed. James River appeals. We…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City Dodge, Inc. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahan v. Avera St. Luke'sSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Pearson v. Franklin Laboratories, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Thunderstik Lodge, Inc. v. ReuerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Barton Solvents, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Prunty Construction, Inc. v. City of CanistotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Dakota Foundry, Inc. v. Tromley Industrial Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Primrose Retirement Communities, LLC and Gillette Retirement, LLC v. Ghidorzi Construction Company, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
- Dakota Style Foods, Inc. v. Sunopta Grains & Foods, Inc.United States District Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.