Legal Opinion

Prunty Construction, Inc. v. City of Canistota

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] The City of Canistota contracted with Prunty Construction, Inc. for a water and sewer project. The City claims that the contract was paid in full. Prunty claims it is owed an additional sum of $59,428 for work performed under the contract. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the City. Prunty and the City appeal.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] The City hired Sayre Associates, Inc. (Sayre) to design and prepare construction and bidding documents for the construction of two projects: (1) a water main and (2) a sanitary sewer and surfacing improvement. Sayre…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. American State Bank v. AdkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Mahan v. Avera St. Luke'sSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Sundt Corp. v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Thunderstik Lodge, Inc. v. ReuerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Culhane v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Hahne v. BurrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hanson v. VERMILLION SCHOOL DISTRICT 13-1South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Quinn v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Smizer v. DreySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API