Prunty Construction, Inc. v. City of Canistota
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] The City of Canistota contracted with Prunty Construction, Inc. for a water and sewer project. The City claims that the contract was paid in full. Prunty claims it is owed an additional sum of $59,428 for work performed under the contract. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the City. Prunty and the City appeal.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] The City hired Sayre Associates, Inc. (Sayre) to design and prepare construction and bidding documents for the construction of two projects: (1) a water main and (2) a sanitary sewer and surfacing improvement. Sayre…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- American State Bank v. AdkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Mahan v. Avera St. Luke'sSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Sundt Corp. v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Thunderstik Lodge, Inc. v. ReuerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Culhane v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Hahne v. BurrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Hanson v. VERMILLION SCHOOL DISTRICT 13-1South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Quinn v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Smizer v. DreySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.