Legal Opinion

State v. Horsley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1990No. 17605Published

1Opinion of the Court

792 P.2d 945 (1990)

117 Idaho 920

STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Todd HORSLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17605.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

April 26, 1990.

Bruce H. Greene, Sandpoint, for defendant-appellant.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Lynn E. Thomas, Sol. Gen. (argued), Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a criminal case. The issues presented are:

1. Is a minute entry signed by the judge sufficient to dismiss a criminal case?

Under the circumstances of this case, we hold that it is not.

2. Is an order dismissing a criminal case nunc pro tunc effective to dismiss the case as of a…

Also in this document: Dissent · Bakes; Dissent · Bistline; Dissent · Bistline; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Bakes; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Bistline; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Boyle.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. CastroNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. United States v. George Michael GwaltneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API