Legal Opinion

Sadler v. Radcliff

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 20, 1927No. 1 Div. 422PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The bill is for specific performance of a sale of land and sought indemnity against the wife’s inchoate dower interest in the event she refused to join in the deed with her husband, in the event the latter was required to convey.

It is admitted that Espalla, Jr., & Co. made the sale of the property on the conditions indicated in the written authority given by Sadler, and that the former evidenced, that sale in writing as indicated.

It is pertinent to inquire whether Espalla, Jr., & Co. had the authority to sell and evidence 'the same in writing, as was done so. to bind'Sadler under the statute…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Jenkins v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Nelson v. Shelby Manufacturing & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Meyer Bros. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Mobile v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Peddy v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Ben Cheeseman Realty Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Clipper v. GordonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. King v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API