Legal Opinion
Faulkner v. Super Valu Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 1, 1993No. 91-1273PublishedCited by 148 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs/appellants submitted applications for vacant warehousemen positions at Super Valu Stores, Inc. but were not considered for the vacancies. Plaintiffs then brought an age discrimination action against Super Valu under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1988). The jury returned a verdict in favor of Super Valu and the plaintiffs appeal, alleging various errors in the district court’s jury instructions and evidentiary decisions.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Super Valu Stores, Inc., the defendanVap-pellee, is a wholesale grocer with a…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- Smith v. City of JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Sharon G. CONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, a Colorado Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Ann Garrison Pamela Bielski Vicky Dunbar Teresita Wells Connie Brady Sherry Conway Patricia Erickson v. Gambro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- McKnight v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Bullington v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.