Legal Opinion

State v. Nason

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 31, 2008No. 26180-8-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kulik, A.C.J.

¶1 James R. Nason appeals two orders from the Spokane County Superior Court, Judges Maryann C. Moreno and Michael P. Price, modifying his sentence and imposing incarceration for violations of the terms of his *749sentence. He argues that (1) the trial court lacks authority to impose a suspended sentence, (2) provisions within the orders violate due process, (3) the trial court erred by denying him credit against his financial obligations for time served, and (4) the county clerk’s involvement in the monitoring and collection of his legal financial obligation violates due process…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. WWJ Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. NasonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. NasonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. NasonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State v. NasonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API