Legal Opinion

State v. WWJ Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1999No. 66469-2PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

— WWJ Corporation and William and Rosemary Johnson were fined $500,000 for violating the Mortgage Broker Practices Act and the Consumer Protection Act 250 times. On appeal they argued the fine violates the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals declined to address the newly raised constitutional issues. We find the Court of Appeals applied the incorrect standard in rejecting review of the constitutional claims, but we affirm nonetheless, finding the newly raised constitutional issues do not merit review under…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. O'HaraWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2000

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API