Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ludwig v. City of Bemidji

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 23, 1973No. 44079PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

These proceedings have been brought by a resident of Beltrami County to enjoin the city of Bemidji under the provisions of the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act, Minn. St. c. 116B, from polluting the Mississippi River and to recover damages arising from a nuisance maintained by the city. Section 116B.03, subd. 1, provides, in part, that “no action shall be allowable under this section for conduct taken by a person pursuant to any * * * permit issued by the pollution control agency * * The issue is whether the city’s permit to discharge effluent into the river was validly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Martin v. WolfsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. State v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State, by Spannaus v. Lloyd A. Fry Roof. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Maanum v. AustCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API