Legal Opinion
State v. Olson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 3, 1991No. C4-91-1132, C6-91-1133PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM J. FLEMING, Acting Judge.
These consolidated appeals are from separate pretrial orders dismissing perjury complaints against respondents Olson (C4-91-1132) and Hahn (C6-91-1133). We affirm the dismissal as to Hahn, and reverse and remand the dismissal as to Olson.
FACTS
The state by separate complaints charged respondents Hahn and Olson with perjury for giving allegedly false testimony at Hahn’s trial on three misdemeanor offenses.
The state had alleged that the misdemeanor offenses occurred in the early morning hours of October 14, 1990, in Spring Valley, Minnesota. Deputy Mark…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. KjeldahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- State v. DeSchepperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Mullin-CostonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. Mullin-CostonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. OanesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. OanesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996