Legal Opinion
Damnjanovic v. United States Department of the Air Force
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 22, 2015No. Civil Case No. 14-11920PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 16]
LINDA V. PARKER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiffs Budimir Damnjanovic and De-sanka Damnjanovic (“Plaintiffs”) seek compensation under the Invention Secrecy Act, 35 U.S.C. § 183, among other things, for damages allegedly' resulting from two secrecy orders the Government imposed on their patent application. Thereafter, Defendants United States of America, United States Department of the Air Force, United States Department of Defense, Deborah Lee James, and Charles T. Hagel (collectively…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Michael T. Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 268Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Azar S. v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Black Farmers Agriculturalists Association, Inc v. VilsackDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2024
- Fuchs v. SpecialtyCare, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025