Fuchs v. SpecialtyCare, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION NATHAN FUCHS et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 3:23-cv-00892 ) CHIEF JUDGE CAMPBELL SPECIALTYCARE, INC., ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOLMES ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM Pending before the Court is Defendant SpecialtyCare, Inc.’s (“SpecialtyCare”) Partial Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) (Doc. No. 134). Plaintiffs Nathan Fuchs (“Fuchs”) and Caitlin Bailey (“Bailey,” collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a response in opposition (“Opposition”) (Doc. No. 140).1 For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.