Legal Opinion
Dome v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided February 6, 2024No. 5:22-cv-00048Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:22-CV-00048-GNS-LLK DEAN DOME and RUTH BOOHER PLAINTIFFS v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (DN 14). For the reasons that follow, the motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Dean Dome (“Dome”) and Ruth Booher (“Booher”) (jointly “Plaintiffs”) were insured by a homeowners’ insurance policy issued by Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”). (See Def.’s Mot.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McPherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Citizens Awareness Network, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.