Legal Opinion

Kane v. Kulongoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1994No. SC S41549PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this original proceeding, petitioner challenges the ballot title for a proposed initiative measure. Petitioner is an elector who, in a timely manner, submitted written comments addressed to the Attorney General’s draft ballot title. Therefore, he is entitled to petition this court seeking a different ballot title. ORS 250.085(2).

The proposed measure, entitled “The Oregon Cannabis Tax Act of 1997,consists of four single-spaced, finely printed pages. It is far too extensive to reproduce here. In broad outline, it consists of a long preamble and three numbered sections. The preamble lists…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hand v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sajo v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Arenz v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nearman/Miller v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Adams v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Adams v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API