Legal Opinion
Arenz v. Keisling
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 1993No. SC S40317PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
In this original proceeding, petitioner challenges the ballot title for a proposed initiative measure. Petitioner is an elector who timely submitted written comments on the Attorney General’s draft ballot title. Therefore, she is entitled to petition this court seeking a different title. ORS 250.085(2).
The Attorney General certified this ballot title to the Secretary of State:
“AMENDS CONSTITUTION: ALLOWS STATE, LOCAL LAWS BANNING OBSCENITY, CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
“QUESTION: Shall Oregon constitutional amendment state that free speech guarantee does not prohibit state, local laws banning obscenity,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Deras v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mannix v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Kane v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Mannix v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996