Legal Opinion

Arenz v. Keisling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1993No. SC S40317PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

In this original proceeding, petitioner challenges the ballot title for a proposed initiative measure. Petitioner is an elector who timely submitted written comments on the Attorney General’s draft ballot title. Therefore, she is entitled to petition this court seeking a different title. ORS 250.085(2).

The Attorney General certified this ballot title to the Secretary of State:

“AMENDS CONSTITUTION: ALLOWS STATE, LOCAL LAWS BANNING OBSCENITY, CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
“QUESTION: Shall Oregon constitutional amendment state that free speech guarantee does not prohibit state, local laws banning obscenity,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Deras v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mannix v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kane v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mannix v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API