State v. Rose
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.
The appellant and one E. E. Griffith were charged by information under Section 4446, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., p. 3052), as accessories before the fact to a robbery in the first degree perpetrated upon one Ross Keeling in Newton County on November 22, 1934, by G. C. McDaniels, Samuel L. Hosp, John Harrison and Ernie Tennison. A severance was taken and during the trial of the case against the appellant, Rose, a nolle prosequi was entered as' to Griffith. That the robbery occurred was not disputed, the only issue of fact being whether the appellant had anything to do with it. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rawlins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- People v. . BeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- State v. MessinoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- State v. RitzMontana Supreme Court · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. IsaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State v. GravesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- State v. HoldenArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. WinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Holden v. BerberichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.