Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Dickinson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 18, 1908No. Gen. No. 13,830PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Assumpsit. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Freeman K. Blake, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

This is a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Municipal Court for $905, rendered in favor of the defendant in error, Schaefer, against plaintiff in error, Dickinson, on the verdict of a jury.

The facts are these: William B. Schaefer, an accountant, residing in Chicago, was dealing in stocks before and in July, 1906, and for a few weeks thereafter, through the stock broker’s office of John Dickinson, doing business as John Dickinson & Co., in that city. Dickinson has an office also in New York city. It is apparent from the whole record that the transactions were of the usual kind when…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Markham v. . JaudonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Baker v. . DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Sturges v. KeithIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Brewster v. Van LiewIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Cothran v. EllisIllinois Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. Van RonkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Hately v. KiserAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  3. Conolly v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Hughes v. BarrellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  5. Lamprecht v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API