Lamprecht v. State
Ohio Supreme Court
Error to the Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The plaintiff in error was indicted upon five counts, viz: the first count charged him-with larceny of a certain check for $2,932.50, the second count charged him with embezzlement of a certain certificate of stock for sixty shares of the stock of The Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad Company, the third count charged him with embezzlement of- the check described in the first count, the fourth count charged him with embezzlement of money, the proceeds of the check mentioned and described in the first and third counts, and the fifth count charges him with obtaining the check aforesaid by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Markham v. . JaudonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Le Marchant v. . MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Content v. . BannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Appleman v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.