Legal Opinion
Conolly v. Foster
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 15, 1932No. 28,610PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.
■ Defendants appeal from a judgment in plaintiff’s fafvor for $37,250.02.
The errors assigned are that the court erred in not directing a verdict in favor of defendants and in denying defendants’ motion for judgment in their favor notwithstanding the verdict. If at the close of the evidence there was not sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury, or if the evidence conclusively showed that plaintiff was not entitled to recover, then it was error not to direct a verdict for defendants and error not to grant judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
The defendants are copartners engaged in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Minnesota Linseed Oil Co. v. Collier White Lead Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1876
- Guy T. Bisbee Co. v. Granite City Investing Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Manning v. HeidelbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Burnham v. LawsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Agner v. BournSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Capp Seville, Inc. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. (In Re Northwest Airlines Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2008