Parton v. Mark Pirtle Oldsmobile-Cadillac-Isuzu, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANTRELL, Judge.
This dispute involves the efficacy of an exculpatory provision in a preprinted automobile repair order signed by the owner of the automobile.
In October of 1984 Mr. Parton, an automobile wholesaler, took a Cadillac automobile to the defendant for repairs. He signed a preprinted form'containing a work order which authorized the defendant to perform the repairs specified thereon. The form used by the defendant contained the following provision in small print in the upper left corner:
“I hereby authorize the repair work hereinafter set forth to be done along with the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Empress Health and Beauty Spa, Inc. v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
- DeFord v. National Life & Accident Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1945
- Olson v. MolzenTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Moss v. FortuneTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- Dodge v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Davis v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1990
- Tate v. Trialco Scrap, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1989
- Board of Directors v. Southwestern Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- Russell v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- Frederick Copeland v. Healthsouth/Methodist Rehabilitation Hospital, LPTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.