Clinton Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Goldberg
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogdeN, J.
Evidence was offered by the plaintiff in support of its claim and tending to show full compliance with the contract on its part and breach of contract on the part of defendants. Likewise the defendants offered evidence tending to show a breach by the plaintiff, thus relieving the defendants from the duty of accepting the shipments. Therefore, in the last analysis the cause was reduced to an issue of fact.
The principles of law involved are plain and well settled. If a buyer of goods, without legal cause, refuses to- accept the goods before the time for performance has expired, such refusal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gillespie v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Ward v. . AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Lamborn & Co. v. Hollingsworth & HatchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Wade v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Hassard-Short v. . HardisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Equitable Leasing Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980