Wade v. . Lutterloh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtOlabksoN, J.
“It is settled by all the decisions on the subject, with none to the contrary, that the findings of fact, made by a referee and approved by the trial judge, are not subject to review on appeal, if they are supported by any competent evidence. Dorsey v. Mining Co., 117 N. C., 60.” Kenney v. Hotel Co., 194 N. C., at p. 45.
“While the courts now assume that covenants are dependent rather than independent, and concurrent on the one hand rather than precedent and subsequent on the other, this rule, like the other rules of modern law on this subject, is merely a guide to aid the court in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ducker v. . CochraneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Cunningham v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Gaylord v. . McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Samonds v. CloningerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Elks v. North State InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Harris & Harris Construction Co. v. Crain & Denbo, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Commercial National Bank of Charlotte v. Charlotte Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Williams v. HabulCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Young v. SweetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Olive v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.