Beaupre v. Brigham
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Bayfield County. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. They contended, among other things, that no jurisdiction had been obtained over the principal defendants, and hence the' judgment against them was invalid, and none could be rendered against the garnishees, citing the cases referred to in the opinion.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Bayfield County. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. They contended, among other things, that no jurisdiction had been obtained over the principal defendants, and hence the' judgment against them was invalid, and none could be rendered against the garnishees, citing the cases referred to in the opinion. They argued that the order of publication was in effect two orders, and personal service out of the state, in compliance with the alternative clause, was a complete service. In this case, the garnishees objected to the admission of the judgment roll…
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The respondents commenced an action against William Keefe on contract, and in said action the said appellants Brigham and Mussel were summoned as garnishees, claiming that they were debtors to the said defendant Keefe. On the trial of the garnishee action the respondents recovered a judgment against the appellants for the sum of $930.74, and from the judgment entered in favor of the respondents the said garnishees appeal to this court.
Upon the hearing of the appeal in this court the appellants assign for error: “(1) That the court erred in admitting evidence; (2) that the court erred in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Keane v. CannovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Market National Bank v. Pacific National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Anderson v. CoburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Pollard v. WegenerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jordan v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- St. Louis Trading Co. v. BarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Roosevelt v. Land & River Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- State ex rel. Weber v. CordesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. HousleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.