Legal Opinion

United States v. Foreman

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 11, 1969No. 21,557PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

Pursuant to his plea of guilty, the accused was convicted of one specification each of larceny and housebreaking with intent to commit larceny, in violation of Articles 121 and 130, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 921 and 930, respectively. As the case reaches us his sentence extends to a bad-conduct discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for one year.

We granted review to consider the effect of a refusal by the law officer to grant a defense request for a contin-*250uanee in order to obtain the presence of a witness and a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. MamaluyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  2. United States v. SweeneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  3. United States v. DanielsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  4. United States v. ManosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  5. United States v. BrowningUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. DunksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. TimmonsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973
  4. United States v. BarfieldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API