Legal Opinion

Roark v. McCutchan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 13, 1927No. 17657PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, C.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover the balance due on a promissory note given by defendants to plaintiff for dental services. The defendants attempted to defeat recovery on the ground that the dental work was faulty, unsatisfactory, and not as warranted by the plaintiff.

The case was tried to a jury on the 20th day of January, 1926. Verdict was returned for the plaintiff and judgment thereon entered on the same date. On the 4th day of February, 1926, the defendants filed a motion for new trial, and upon consideration of the matter, the court refused to consider the motion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Osage Mercantile Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. Collins-Dietz-Morris Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Ford v. Stone Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Linden v. Southwestern National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. Linden v. Southwestern National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API