Legal Opinion · Dissent

Linden v. Southwestern National Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 11, 1974No. 45785Published

1DissentHodges, Justice

It is provided by 12 O.S.1971 § 580 that after a case is submitted to the jury and they retire for deliberation, the officer in charge shall not permit any communication to be made to them except to ask if they have agreed upon their verdict, unless by order of the court. This statute has not been considered under the factual situation presented to us. The companion criminal law statute, 22 O.S.1971 § 857, contains similar language insofar as communications to the jury are concerned. It provides that the officer must not permit any person to speak to or communicate with *1081the jury nor do so…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Fillippon v. Albion Vein Slate Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Havenor v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Southern Pac. Co. v. KlingeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. Ridley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API