Legal Opinion
Eastern Stainless Corp. v. American Protection Insurance
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 10, 1993No. Civ. A. WN-93-304PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Paper No. 4). Plaintiff has filed an Opposition (Paper No. 7) and Defendant has Replied (Paper No. 10). 1 Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Paper No. 14) which Defendant opposed (Paper No. 15). Upon a review of the motion and the applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6) and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss should be denied and that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint should be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
This diversity action arises…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Kramer v. Bally's Park Place, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Boring v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Rouse Co. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Schaefer v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Cecilia Schwaber Trust Two v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity, Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Millennium Inorganic Chemicals Ltd. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.