Brodsky v. 163-35 Ninth Avenue Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The principal issue on this appeal is whether Special Term properly denied plaintiffs’ motion for a Yellowstone preliminary injunction (First Nat. Stores v Yellowstone Shopping Center, 21 NY2d 630), in light of recently enacted RPAPL 753 (subd 4) (L 1982, ch 870, eff July 29, 1982). We hold that Special Term properly denied plaintiffs’ motion for a Yellowstone injunction.
*106The dispute in this case arose over an attempt by the prime tenant to sublet her apartment in Whitestone, Queens. The defendants (the landlord), contending that the subtenancy violated the terms of the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- First National Stores, Inc. v. Yellowstone Shopping Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Post v. 120 East End Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wilen v. Harridge House AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Nunez v. 164 Prospect Park West Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Post v. 120 East End Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Times Square Stores Corp. v. Bernice Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Asherson v. SchumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Kanter v. East 62nd Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Hopp v. RaimondiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Landmark Properties v. OlivoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.