Legal Opinion
Nunez v. 164 Prospect Park West Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action arising out of a residential lease for a declaratory judgment, permanent injunction, and damages, defendants appeal as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kirsch, J.), dated February 4,1982, as denied their cross motion to dismiss the complaint and granted a preliminary injunction. Order modified, so as to delete the provision thereof granting plaintiffs a preliminary injunction. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The plaintiffs are tenants in a building owned by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Albini v. Solork AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Wuertz v. CowneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Claim of Mlodozeniec v. Worthington Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Post v. 120 East End Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Brodsky v. 163-35 Ninth Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Novak v. FischbeinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Ocean Farragut Associates v. SawyerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
- Newmann v. Mapama Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983