Legal Opinion
Landmark Properties v. Olivo
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided September 30, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
This holdover summary proceeding, predicated upon breach of a substantial obligation of the tenancy in the form of harboring a dog, is before this court for the second time (see Landmark Props. v Olivo, 5 Misc 3d 18 [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2004]). Shortly before the original appeal was heard, tenants found a new home for the dog in question. Nevertheless, we found that a substantial obligation of the tenancy had been *3ached by tenants’ harboring of the dog, and that the final lent of possession entered in favor of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- First National Stores, Inc. v. Yellowstone Shopping Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Post v. 120 East End Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- New York City Housing Authority v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- J & A Vending, Inc. v. J.A.M. Vending, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Parkchester Apartments Co. v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goldcrest Realty Co. v. 61 Bronx River Road Owners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Hopp v. RaimondiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Scarborough Manor Owners Corp. v. RobsonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
- Scarborough Manor Owners Corp. v. RobsonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017